Public Art in Ottawa is a Competitive Advantage, Not Just a “Nice-to-Have”
Culture and community build long-term prosperity.
Easy target
People like Councillor David Brown will say that there is never enough money in a City budget for public art; that there are higher operational priorities for our tax dollars.
Put aside for a minute that Brown recently voted to spend half a billion dollars on what is effectively corporate welfare for some of the richest developers in Ottawa, aka Lansdowne 2.0.
Art is important for art’s sake. But Brown and other self-styled fiscal hawks need to understand that public art is also important for economic development and prosperity.
Let’s start with the recent departure of one of Ottawa’s most prominent tech executives and what this says about considering public art a “nice-to-have”.
Why Harley left town
Last summer, Shopify President Harley Finkelstein relocated from Ottawa to Montreal. An interview around the time of his move is telling:
While Finkelstein says he and his wife enjoy living in Ottawa, they always felt like something was missing. “As we began to think about where we wanted to raise our four- and seven-year-old daughters it became clear that it wasn’t there.”
Finkelstein says three cities made the Top Three as possibilities on their list. … “Ultimately, Montreal won. And it won for two main reasons: culture and community.” … If you see a city with a disproportionate number of artists, musicians and chefs that’s probably a city with great culture.
Finkelstein says Montreal is the perfect city for those who have business in their blood and believes the city’s immigrants have a lot to do with that. “I don’t think there’s any city in the world that is more entrepreneurial than Montreal.”
For Finkelstein, Ottawa falls short on culture.
Businesses go where the top talent wants to be. And that talent wants to be in the most interesting cities. Culture, including public art, is what makes cities stand out.
Austin TX, for example, leveraged its music culture to become the fastest growing tech centre in America.
The role of City Hall in creating wealth
Cities have limited tax powers to attract business investment. Federal and provincial governments, not cities, are in charge of the corporate income tax breaks that businesses seek. Cities can provide property tax relief, although the jury is out on whether this attracts investment or just provides someone with a sweetheart deal.
Cities support wealth creation first and foremost by making themselves great and interesting places to live. Quality of life is a competitive advantage for cities, starting with housing affordability and the ease of getting around. Once those criteria are met, a vibrant culture and a sense of community is what separates great cities from the merely good.
Back to Ottawa
Brown is upset that the City of Ottawa spent $26m on public art over 7 years. That works out to less than $4m a year, or 0.1% of the annual budget.
Given his concern for fiscal discipline, perhaps Brown should start looking at the other 99.9% of the annual budget. Or the half billion dollar corporate handout he supports.
Another case of 'screw downtown', this time from someone whose bio reads like he's singing John Denver's 'Thank god I'm a country boy!'
It's easy for the councillor in a rural ward to criticize public art, which benefits urban areas the most. The murals and sculptures you see downtown help break up all the ugly concrete, glass and steel of our boring, aging buildings. Out in the country, you have the fields and trees to look at. And the 'burbs? No room or time for anything nice to look at while you zip along 4 or 6 lane roads to the box stores' huge parking lots.
All those services and priorities he mentions? Maybe someone should remind Councillor Brown that it's the urban areas subsidizing the rural ones while singing 'Country Roads'. All those long country roads with one house every kilometre or so means one property tax bill to pay for it getting plowed, paved and repaired . It's the downtown folks who pay for that.
Instead of complaining about public art, Councillor Brown should be looking to de-amalgamate the city. That way he and his community won’t have to pay for public art and the rest of the city won’t have to take care of those long, long country roads. I’m sure the rural communities will have no trouble paying for it with all the money saved from not paying for public art.
David Brown is just one of many councillors who seem to know the cost of everything and the value of nothing.